Stay up to date
with our most
recent publications.
At Phoenix Medical, we believe the rapidly evolving marketplace requires new ways of thinking about managing patients. Whether those patients are at-risk or high-risk, we aim to transform previous hospital models and implement innovative, forward-thinking solutions for the benefit of each patient—and their provider.
Want to learn about our latest thoughts and ideas, straight from our team of experts? These are delivered monthly to your inbox or here for your review on the most pressing topics in care management.
The MCSN does not apply to every patient whose status changes from inpatient to outpatient, nor does it replace the MOON or the requirements associated with Condition Code 44.
There is an important distinction between the two, and that distinction may be becoming more important as healthcare moves further away from managing individual encounters towards managing total utilization and episodes of care.
I have long supported educating medical staff on medical necessity, the Two-Midnight Rule, and the practical application of the Rule to all patients.
Existing advance care planning documentation already available within the patient’s EMR satisfies the measure, provided it remains accessible during the admission.
Hospitals continue to experience limited post-acute capacity with delayed transitions of care, while simultaneously caring for an aging population whose demand for home-based services continues to grow.
As this list disappears, hospitals are losing a regulatory shortcut, and must instead rely on physician documentation and strong utilization management processes to support level-of-care decisions.
This policy change creates a need for careful, patient-specific status determinations, rather than automatic assumptions based only on the procedure being performed.
One observation has become increasingly difficult to ignore: I can often identify a hospital’s AO before anyone tells me, simply by observing operational workflows.
An adaptive UR model organizes staff according to the work being performed, rather than the physical location of the patient.
Although this model has served organizations for years, today’s technology environment has fundamentally changed the role and expectations of utilization management.
Under essentially every circumstance, physician advisors are most effective when working in lockstep with their partners in case and utilization management leadership.
Healthcare organizations are already facing increasing administrative responsibilities; the addition of Medicaid work requirement exemptions introduces another layer of documentation and additional risk of administrative burnout.
Maternal health issues are common in the weeks and months after birth, and can affect a child’s short and long-term trajectory.
While these tasks are essential to patient progression, they are highly administrative and often divert professional staff from more complex clinical and discharge planning responsibilities.
Improving communication with these tools will do more than just streamline processes. It can help build bridges between bedside care, hospital operations, and the billing department.
Instead of allowing your physician advisor or physician advisory team’s prior successes to disintegrate into dust, consider modeling the clinical division of scope via sub-specialization.
Organizations will need to manage two parallel realities: dealing with increasingly restrictive MA authorization oversight while simultaneously assuming broader financial accountability for FFS joint replacement episodes.
One of the most prevalent consequences of ED-initiated admission orders is increased status conversions.
The inclusion of sepsis in HRRP would further emphasize the importance of longitudinal care models that extend beyond the inpatient setting.
More broadly, MA plans have introduced several notable operational changes, including the elimination or restructuring of denial-triggered peer-to-peer (P2P) pathways, compressed clinical submission timelines, and a shift toward modified payment methodologies on typical Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) contracts.
This proposal is described in the proposed ruling as a broader recalibration by CMS one that re-centers the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) on clinical severity rather than social complexity.
Although the updated ABN instructions involve only minor revisions, they highlight the importance of maintaining strong frontline workflows.
While UR, CDI, and physician advisors all face an uphill battle to define their value, these labels often place them in a reactive framework that unintentionally silos their work.